We’re going to see more of that. “That” is the conflict pitting green power developers facing ever growing demand for clean energy and environmentalists who want to preserve the often remote areas that are attractive to clean tech developers.
Yesterday, utility-scale solar developer BrightSource Energy, facing intense opposition from local environmentalists and politicians, opted to walk away from a project to build a solar farm in California’s eastern Mojave Desert, reports the Los Angeles Times.
Oakland, Calif.-based BrightSource, whose backers include Google and clean tech VC VantagePoint Venture Partners, had planned to develop its solar farm, requiring the deployment of tens of thousands of mirrors in a 5,130-acres (2076 hectares) remote area known as as Broadwell Dry Lake.
BrightSource probably concluded that the opposition from environmentalists and powerful politicians, including Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) was not worth the time and money. Instead, the company will set its eye on one of the 19 other pieces of acreage it’s secured for development from the U.S. Bureau Land of Management.
The conflict does underscore one of clean tech’s Achilles’ heels as it morphs from a largely idealistic enterprise into a “big business.” As it stands, they, much like a Chevron (a BrightSource investor, so is BP) or ExxonMobil, today’s clean energy companies have to grow their business — which happens to involve the development of large, remote tracts of land — and respond to the demands of environmentalists and their traditional land preservation agenda.
The environmental movement seems to be split in two. It’s pro-business, seeing green as a way to create profits and jobs, and sometimes willing to develop wilderness areas if it means less CO2 pumped into the atmosphere. Count not only companies like BrightSource in that camp, but also President Obama. The movement is also an advocacy movement that seeks to preserve land and views any encroachment, even by a carbon-free energy companies, as a negative.
In her statement praising BrightSource’s decision, Sen. Feinstein lightly addressed this issue:
“It’s clear that conservation and renewable energy development are not mutually exclusive goals — there is room enough in the California desert for both.”
Despite Senator Feinstein’s optimism, this green on green tension is likely to grow as more states implement Renewable Energy Standards, requiring utilities to produce more clean wind or solar-generated electricity. California legislators just approved a law requiring state power utilities to generate 33 percent of their electricity from renewables by 2020.
Aware that opposition both from environmentalists and NIMBY folks could slow the Obama’s ambitious green agenda, Senator Harry Reid (D-Nev.) introduced legislation in Washington earlier this year that would streamline the contentious permitting process by giving the Interior Department final say on project siting issues, overriding local Public Utilities Commission.