6 October '09
9:32 AM EDT
No Comments
  Cleantech
  Funding

$10 Trillion Investment Needed to Stabilize Emissions

Good news for cleantech ventures. The International Energy Agency (Web site) estimates that it will take a $10 trillion investment (yes, that’s a TR in front of the -illion) in clean energy between 2010 and 2030 to limit the earth’s warming.

The scenario was previewed today in a release from the agency, an intergovernmental energy policy advisor to 28 member countries including the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom. See a report excerpt here.

The report concludes that the global recession has caused a decline in polluting technologies and made it feasible to limit warming to 2 degrees celsius. In order to stabilize greenhouse gas emissions at 450 ppm of CO2 equivalent, emissions in 2020 will need to be reduced by 3.8 gigatonnes worldwide. Read More »

30 September '09
3:46 PM EDT
1 Comment
  Policy

The Boxer-Kerry Bill

Now that health care has been solved once and forever, the august members of the U.S. Senate have turned their attention to saving the world.

OK, snarkiness aside, the Boxer- Kerry Bill was released today as an alternative to the Waxman-Markey climate change bill that made it through the house early this summer. The headline numbers: 20 percent reductions from 2005 levels by 2020 in Boxer – Kerry instead of 17 percent by 2020 in Waxman-Markey.

The bill summary is here (be sure to pack a lunch if you plan on reading the whole 800-page bill.)

Environmental Capital notes that Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., and President Obama have both emphasized jobs as a key to the bill. The New York Times’ Green, Inc., also points out the words “climate change” and “global warming” do not appear in the bill’s official title, the “Clean Energy Jobs and American Power Act.” Saving the Earth is a tough sell in Congress, apparently.

Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., launches a salvo against the legislation here. The most interesting question, which we promise to explore at length:

Senator Boxer, because this is a global issue, how does your draft ensure that other developing countries, such as China and India, will make binding emissions cuts that are as strict as those that are required for the United States under this Act?

With so much attention focused on health care reform, it might seem a strange time to take up climate change again.

Actually, we think it’s the ideal time to get a bill passed, since most opponents of big government programs are already consumed with the “clear and present danger” to health care. It’s tough to imagine that Inhofe will be able to muster a strong opposition to this bill, especially with powerful interests like the U.S. Chamber of Commerce being battered by members for its climate change position.

14 September '09
5:15 PM EDT
No Comments
  Funding
  Policy

The Mega-Big Chinese Clean Tech Market, Talk About Opportunity!

Remember the Beijing Olympics? A little more than a year ago the question driving the media cycle in the months and days leading to the games was the city’s endemic pollution and whether authorities would ever be able to provide some crucial clean air to the athletes competing there. So, what did Chinese authorities do? Simple, they shut down the polluting factories for the duration of the games. An impressive feat, only possible in a single party state like China.

But the move was just a bandaid solution. Now, China, one of the world’s largest consumers and producers of coal, is taking a more long-term approach to resolving its “CO2 problem.” On the policy side, it has been talking to the world’s other energy guzzler, the U.S., to work together on climate change issues. On the investment side, in the wake of the global economic crisis, China’s announced a mega $220 billion green-focused stimulus package to prop up wind and solar generation.

Last year, according to the American Wind Energy Association, China added some 6,300 megawatts in wind capacity. The International Energy Agency estimates the country needs to increase its total generation capacity by 800 gigawatts by 2030 to meet demand — roughly double its current capacity.

This is just a start. The much talked about China Greentech report, released last week, estimates that the country’s green energy market, which includes everything from wind and solar farms and battery-powered automobiles, could be worth between $500 billion and $1 trillion a year (yes, that’s per year!) by 2013.

The number is mouthwatering for many clean tech companies. A sliver of that pie could secure a comfortable bottom line for decades.

Already the country’s growing cleantech needs has lead to the creation of some homegrown champions like Yingli Solar. It’s also motivated key foreign players to invest there. Marlboro, Mass., EverGreen Solar is spending up to $20 million to finance the construction of a new 100 megawatt solar panel manufacturing facility in Wuhan, China, it will jointly operate with Jiawei Solar, a local company. And last week Tempe, Ariz. First Solar announced an MOU with the Chinese government to develop a 2 GW PV farm in the country’s remote Inner Mongolia region. We wrote about that here, impressed by the boldness of the plan, although there are some serious questions about whether First Solar can even execute this mammoth plan. Securing basic materials, including tellurium, on which it relies to build its low cost PV panels will be a major challenge for the company.

On China’s green aspiration, Environmental Capital’s Keith Johnson (quoting the greentech report) writes that the country’s heavy-handed approach offers obvious upsides and some downsides.

China Greentech Reports writes:

The benefits of China’s concentrated and state-dominated greentech markets are offset by poor incentives; lack of competition reduces efficiencies and innovation that come from open and competitive markets. The challenge for any nation, including China, is to know how and when to strike a balance between these two sides […]

Back to the Beijing Olympics. The government’s decision to just shut down the region’s polluters underscored the upside of that top-hand approach in implementing high impact, short-term policies. However, it probably won’t work to implement a long-term transformative energy policy. At least, that is if China is able to fuel its own innovation based on the intellectual property of outside investors, who are likely to be willing to share proprietary technology for a piece of China’s huge green pie.

17 July '09
11:34 AM EDT
No Comments
  Cleantech
  Wind

GE’s Energy Infrastructure Profits up 17 Percent for Q2

wind_main_imgOne of the most pressing questions in the green energy revolution (if indeed it is at hand) is, who’s going to be making money from the rush toward sustainability?

This morning we have at least a tentative answer: General Electric.

The industrial giant’s overall profitability took a nosedive in the second quarter but energy infrastructure profits increased 17 percent over Q2 2008 to $1.79 billion, despite a small dip in revenues. It represented a whopping 37 percent of profit for the quarter. As our friends at WSJ’s Environmental Capital blog note (as ever, thanks to Keith Johnson) the energy infrastructure division makes generation equipment including wind turbines and parts for nuclear power plants.

How much of this surge in profitability is due to green energy compared with traditional power generation, we don’t know yet. But we have to imagine the company will be focusing more on the cleantech sector as, say, Britain looks to populate its countryside and the Thames Estuary with windmills and focus on renewables.

10 July '09
11:42 AM EDT
No Comments
  Funding
  Policy

How the G8 Fails Greentech Investors

Do G8 leaders discourage investment in green energy by not committing to shared goals on climate change?

Simon Johnson, the MIT Sloan School of Management professor who has successfully transformed himself into a diversified media brand, levels this provocative charge against the world’s developed economies in a post on his blog The Baseline Scenario this morning. His broader point is that G8 nations destabilize oil prices but we’re most interested in this claim:           

They claim to see no link between their failure to converge on climate change/environmental policies and what happens to energy prices. The extent to which industrialized countries effectively control carbon emissions will have a big impact on the longer-run demand for oil.  Flip-flopping on this issue discourages investment in the energy sector (regular and alternative), and thus directly and indirectly contributes to oil price volatility.

This argument dovetails with Rep. Henry Waxman’s claim, made earlier this week on New York Public Radio, that businesses “want to know what the rules are going to be” before they invest in cleantech.

But it points to problems for green energy sector beyond the eventual passage of a cap-and-trade bill in the U.S. Unless some broader accord with enforceable targets for carbon emissions – not just a desire to limit warming to 2 degrees celsius –  can be reached among the G8 countries and beyond, greentech investors will be without a compass.

Page 1 of 512345»