Obama to Attend Copenhagen Climate Change Talks

Wait a second... he's already been to Copenhagen.

The last time he was in Copenhagen

UPDATE: The White House has released an official statement on President Obama’s planned trip to speak at the United Nations climate talks in Copenhagen on Dec. 9.

The statement reads, in part:

…the President is prepared to put on the table a U.S. emissions reduction target in the range of 17% below 2005 levels in 2020 and ultimately in line with final U.S. energy and climate legislation.

Read the full statement after the jump.

President to Attend Copenhagen Climate Talks

Administration Announces U.S. Emission Target for Copenhagen

The White House announced today that President Obama will travel to Copenhagen on Dec. 9 to participate in the United Nations Climate Change Conference, where he is eager to work with the international community to drive progress toward a comprehensive and operational Copenhagen accord.   The President has worked steadily on behalf of a positive outcome in Copenhagen throughout the year.  Based on the President’s work on climate change over the past 10 months – in the Major Economies Forum, the G20, bilateral discussions and multilateral consultations – and based on progress made in recent, constructive discussions with China and India’s Leaders, the President believes it is possible to reach a meaningful agreement in Copenhagen.  The President’s decision to go is a sign of his continuing commitment and leadership to find a global solution to the global threat of climate change, and to lay the foundation for a new, sustainable and prosperous clean energy future.   

The White House also announced that, in the context of an overall deal in Copenhagen that includes robust mitigation contributions from China and the other emerging economies, the President is prepared to put on the table a U.S. emissions reduction target in the range of 17% below 2005 levels in 2020 and ultimately in line with final U.S. energy and climate legislation.  In light of the President’s goal to reduce emissions 83% by 2050, the expected pathway set forth in this pending legislation would entail a 30% reduction below 2005 levels in 2025 and a 42% reduction below 2005 in 2030.  This provisional target is in line with current legislation in both chambers of Congress and demonstrates a significant contribution to a problem that the U.S. has neglected for too long.  With less than two weeks to go until the beginning of the Copenhagen conference, it is essential that the countries of the world, led by the major economies, do what it takes to produce a strong, operational agreement that will both launch us on a concerted effort to combat climate change and serve as a stepping stone to a legally binding treaty.  The President is working closely with Congress to pass energy and climate legislation as soon as possible.

Underscoring President Obama’s commitment to American leadership on clean energy and combating climate change, the White House also announced today that a host of Cabinet secretaries and other top officials from across the Administration will travel to Copenhagen for the conference.  Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack, Commerce Secretary Gary Locke, Energy Secretary Steven Chu, and Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa P. Jackson are all scheduled to attend, along with Council on Environmental Quality Chair Nancy Sutley, and Assistant to the President for Energy and Climate Change Carol Browner.

For the first time, the U.S. delegation will have a U.S. Center at the conference, providing a unique and interactive forum to share our story with the world.  In addition to working with other countries to advance American interests, U.S. delegates will keynote a series of events highlighting actions by the Obama Administration to provide domestic and global leadership in the transition to a clean energy economy.  Topics will range from energy efficiency investments and global commitments to renewables policy and clean energy jobs.  The following keynote events and speakers are currently scheduled:

  • Wednesday, December 9th: Taking Action at Home, EPA Administrator Lisa P. Jackson
  • Thursday, December 10th: New Energy Future: the role of public lands in clean energy production and carbon capture, Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar
  • Friday, December 11th: Clean Energy Jobs in a Global Marketplace, Commerce Secretary Gary Locke
  • Monday, December 14th: Leading in Energy Efficiency and Renewables, Energy Secretary Steven Chu
  • Tuesday, December 15th: Clean Energy Investments: creating opportunities for rural economies, Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack
  • Thursday, December 17th: Backing Up International Agreement with Domestic Action, CEQ Chair Nancy Sutley and Assistant to the President Carol Browner

ORIGINAL POST: U.S. President Barack Obama will stop in at the United Nations’ climate change talks in Copenhagen on his way to Oslo to receive the Nobel Peace Prize, The New York Times is reporting.

Obama apparently will propose CO2 cuts of 17 percent of 2005 levels by 2020, a target that tracks the Waxman-Markey bill that passed through the House of Representatives this spring and close to the 20 percent mark proposed in the stalled Kerry-Boxer measure in the senate.

The news is not altogether surprising given that he had made hedged statements earlier this month about going to Copenhagen if his presence will make a difference. His recent swing through Asia and meetings with India’s Prime Minister this week also gave him an opportunity to feel out those major developing economies, which ultimately hold the key to successful curbs on greenhouse gas emissions.

The president will deliver an address at the talks on Dec. 9 before heading to Oslo on Dec. 10, to pick up his Nobel. (We suggested exactly this arrangement — with perhaps a little antiquing with Michelle on the seven-hour drive between the two cities, a few months ago.) The White House has not posted its press briefing transcripts yet, but we will post more when we know it.

Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said on Monday, however, that Obama will focus on getting a “binding political agreement” out of Copenhagen but didn’t expect miracles after years of inaction.

…I don’t think any of us were under the illusion that, again, having been off the world stage for so long, in dealing with this issue and in understanding what it was going to take to get developing nations of the world at the table that all these issues might be neatly wrapped up by December of this year.

Photo: Courtesy White House/Chuck Kennedy

Comments
  • Guille

    Climate changes racdially due to natural forces. Following is a partial list of factors that affect climate:VolcanoesLocation and size of land masses (continental drift generates large shifts in distribution of temperature, precipitation, ocean currents, etc.)Insolation (changes in solar energy output and earth’s position relative to the sun)Atmospheric composition (more water, methane and CO2 leads to higher temperatures, less leads to lower temps)Amount of ice cover (this affects how much sunlight is reflected back into space vs. how much is absorbed and converted to heat energy, AKA the albedo effect)Coverage of land by plants (more plant cover moderates temps, less leads to more extremes in temperature and lower precipitation)Humans affect climate primarily by changing atmospheric composition more CO2, slightly more methane, plus feedback effects that increase methane and water content of the atmosphere, plus further feedback from melting ice (albedo effect). We also affect climate by destroying forests, paving the land, leaving ground fallow. There is new evidence suggesting that soot from nations like China and India, where pollution laws are weak, promotes melting of snow and ice by accumulating on the surface and making frozen precip darker, thus heating it more rapidly. This effect is strongest in the Pacific Northwest, which bears the brunt of China’s particulate air pollution.Your question contains a false premise, thus it couldn’t be answered directly. There isn’t a single scientist on the planet who doesn’t agree with you that climate change is largely a natural phenomenon. That’s not the issue in the global warming debate, it’s a red herring used by deniers to change the subject away from evidence to irrelevant arguments that are already incorporated in climate models. Duh.